Re: Why?
From: David Frascone (davefrascone.com)
Date: 13 Dec 2001 23:00:15 -0000
> > Brian Cain also had a command DTD proposal but I haven't checked if it is
> > still true to the ABNF in the Diameter RFC:
> > 
> > http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/aaa-wg/2001-05/msg00087.html
> 
> I'll check it out.


Ok, I looked at it.  His representation allows for restricting occurances
of avps to one and many.  

Incorporating his changes yeilds:

<!ATTLIST avprule
        name IDREF #REQUIRED
        position (first | last | unspecified)  "unspecified"
        maximum CDATA "none"
        minimum CDATA "0"
>

Allowing for both position constraints, an avp being required (minimum=1), and
allowing for at most one avp (maximum=1)


Comments?

  • Re: Why?, (continued)
      • Re: Why? David Frascone, December 12 2001
      • Re: Why? David Frascone, December 13 2001
        • RE: Why? Mark Jones, December 13 2001
        • Re: Why? David Frascone, December 13 2001
        • Re: Why? David Frascone, December 13 2001

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.