Re: Why?
From: David Frascone (davefrascone.com)
Date: 13 Dec 2001 18:50:58 -0000
On Thursday, 13 Dec 2001, Mark Jones wrote:
> Looks good, Dave.
> 
> I think we'll also need a way to specify whether additional arbitrary AVPs
> are allowed in the command, i.e. something that equates to the '* [AVP]'
> that appears in the ABNF for most of the command. Something along the lines
> of:
> 
> <!ATTLIST requestrules
>       arbitrary-avps (yes | no) "no"
> >

I think optional AVPS are always allowed, no?

> Brian Cain also had a command DTD proposal but I haven't checked if it is
> still true to the ABNF in the Diameter RFC:
> 
> http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/aaa-wg/2001-05/msg00087.html

I'll check it out.


-Dave

  • RE: Why?, (continued)
    • RE: Why? Mark Jones, December 12 2001
      • Re: Why? David Frascone, December 12 2001
      • Re: Why? David Frascone, December 13 2001
        • RE: Why? Mark Jones, December 13 2001
        • Re: Why? David Frascone, December 13 2001
        • Re: Why? David Frascone, December 13 2001

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.