Xml Mailing List: Re: Why?

[David Frascone (dave]

Ahhh!  I understand completely now.  I'll either leave it, or do something
similar to what's below.  I'm fixing all the xmllint stuff now and adding
the avps.  I'll do a check-in sometime tomorrow.

-Dave

On Wednesday, 12 Dec 2001, Mark Jones wrote:
> Dave,
> 
> Mea culpa. The reason I split the commands into 'request' and 'answer' was
> the expectation that we would soon be expanding the <command> element to
> include sub-elements to define the mandatory/optional/fixed avps each
> contained.
> 
> An alternative would be:
> 
> <command name="Ping" code="511" vendor-id="42">
>       <request>
>               -- avps in request
>       </request>
>       <answer>
>               -- avps in answer
>       </answer>
> </command>
> 
> Either way, we need somewhere to hang the command definition and requests do
> differ from answers in their avp content.
> 
> (BTW, the recent email silence is due to an internal re-org which has pushed
> me away from any 'official' Diameter work for the moment.)
> 
> Regards,
>        Mark
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xml mailing list
> Xml [at] mail.frascone.com
> http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/xml