Lwapp Mailing List: RE: Lightweight definition?

[Mani, Mahalingam (Mahalingam) (mmani]

Let me try: approximately what makes sense in terms of real-time
functions - that cannot tolerate unbound  or not-so well-bound latencies
is what I would characterize for correctness. I would agree that it does
not apply to real-time functions.

In the same breath I would also say some real-time placements in other
than APs does not really mean incorrect - but may lead to constraints in
topological separation between AP & AC.

-mani
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Branislav Meandzija [mailto:bran [at] arraycomm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:15 AM
> To: Mani, Mahalingam (Mahalingam); James Kempf; gspsl [at] yahoo.com.sg;
LWAPP
> Subject: RE: [Lwapp] Lightweight definition?
> 
> 
> >
> > It is important (and should not take long) to get away from the
notion
> > of 'lightweight'. The lightness is a side-effect.
> >
> > The main effect is the correct functional separations between AP &
AC.
> 
> I am not convinced that the functional separation is correct. An
equally
> valid paradigm is
> traditional manager/agent. How do we measure "correctness" here?
> 
> Branislav
>