| Re: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: James Kempf (kempf |
|
| Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:09:38 -0600 (CST) | |
<PRC> Basically, that's quite close. The protocol used in LWAPP is 802.11
over UDP, similar to
how L2TP works (which is PPP over UDP). Note that the LWAPP protocol is
modeled after the 802.11
protocol - unlike L2TP which is really designed for dial-up (although it is
used for more than
just dial-up today).
jak>>Is L2TP tied to PPP or could it be used and/or modified for CAPWAP?
<PRC> Multiple reasons. One is to push down policies (allow traffic for a
particular
MAC address), while others are for configuration reasons (change channel to
x on radio y).
jak>>OK. So that means there is still some signaling independent of the
tunnel.
jak
- RE: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP, (continued)
-
RE: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP Pat R. Calhoun, November 17 2003
-
Re: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP James Kempf, November 17 2003
- Re: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP Rama Krishna Prasad, November 17 2003
-
Re: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP James Kempf, November 17 2003
-
RE: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP Pat R. Calhoun, November 17 2003
- Re: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP James Kempf, November 17 2003
-
RE: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP Pat R. Calhoun, November 17 2003
-
RE: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP Yang, Lily L, November 17 2003
- RE: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP Paulo Francisco, November 17 2003
- Re: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP Rama Krishna Prasad, November 17 2003
- RE: Another Way to Think about CAPWAP Pat R. Calhoun, November 17 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.