Re: Issue: Use of a label in derivation of keys from the MSK
From: Lakshminath Dondeti (ldondetiqualcomm.com)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:49:46 -0800 (PST)
If we are to do this, we should summarize all the known uses of the MSK: In some cases it is used for deriving traffic keys and in other cases, traffic keys along with other MSK-equivalent keys. Some specifications achieve key separation by using different parts of the MSK for different purposes and use key labels for key separation thereafter. Others use labels alone for key separation. The MSK is also used as a substitute for LTCs in the IKEv2 context.

Given the complexity of the state of affairs, a simple statement along the lines of "use key labels for key separation" is not really accurate.

regards,
Lakshminath

On 11/20/2007 2:06 PM, Bernard_Aboba [at] hotmail.com wrote:
We haven't restricted the use of the MSK in IETF documentation thus far
and hence, several lower layers have used it in different ways.

I believe that all existing uses of the MSK utilize labels for
key derivation. Can you name a specific exception? _________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap


Arhives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/eap

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.