eap Mailing List: Re: Issue: Section 5.5 Authorization Requirement

[Glen Zorn (glenzorn]

[gwz] 
...

My take is that there are certainly things that we could fix in the
document, but as a whole it passes my bar for PS by a good margin. It
makes no sense to tweak the document for years. The WG has sent it
forward, external and IESG reviewers have said what they have to say.
Lets ship it. If there is a need we can issue a bis, a correction, or
address some specific topic in future documents.
[gwz] 
I'd just like to note that for the vast majority of its lifetime this
document has been either unreadable, incomprehensible or both.  I, for one,
basically despaired of fixing it & fell back on the hope that the authors
would fix it themselves; I know that I'm not alone on this.
[/gwz]