Re: Issue 398: Discuss
From: Glen Zorn (gwz) (gwzcisco.com)
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 20:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Bernard Aboba <mailto:bernard_aboba [at] hotmail.com> allegedly scribbled on
Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:05 PM:

...

> In section 2.2:
>  >Where the backend server FQDN differs from the subjectAltName in
> the  >certificate, the AAA client may not be able to successfully
> determine  >whether it is talking to the correct backend
> authentication server.   
> 
> Why does the AAA client even examine the certificate used within the
> EAP method? 

I think that this problem is one result of the sloppy terminology I
mentioned in a previous comment: of course, the AAA server has no
business looking at this cert but the EAP server does.  The problem
arises from the inappropriate conflation of the back-end EAP server and
AAA server entities.

> 
>  >An EAP authenticator MUST NOT share any keying material with 
> >another EAP authenticator, since if one EAP authenticator were 
> >compromised, this would enable the compromise of keying material on 
> >another authenticator.   
> 
> This text needs to be fixed to allow 802.11r style key hierarchies.
> Previous text gets this correct.
  • Issue 398: Discuss Bernard Aboba, March 8 2007
    • Re: Issue 398: Discuss Glen Zorn (gwz), March 8 2007

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.