| Re: Ordered delivery of EAP messages | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pasi.Eronen (Pasi.Eronen |
|
| Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:46:16 -0800 (PST) | |
Glen Zorn wrote: > My question is, since EAP is also a lockstep protocol, under what > conditions could EAP messages be delivered out of order, regardless > of lower layer behavior WRT in-order delivery? This was discussed as part of issue 188 a very long time ago :) Back then (October 2003), I wrote: Lower layer ordering guarantees are needed because the Identifier field is not required to be ordered. If messages can be reordered, the peer can't necessarily distinguish a new EAP Request from a reordered retransmission of an old request. See http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pana-pana-02.txt, Appendix A for a concrete example. Best regards, Pasi
-
Ordered delivery of EAP messages Glen Zorn (gwz), March 6 2007
- Re: Ordered delivery of EAP messages Pasi.Eronen, March 6 2007
-
Re: Ordered delivery of EAP messages Bernard Aboba, March 6 2007
- Re: Ordered delivery of EAP messages Glen Zorn (gwz), March 6 2007
- Re: Ordered delivery of EAP messages Bernard Aboba, March 6 2007
- Re: Ordered delivery of EAP messages Alper Yegin, March 6 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.