Re: EAP pre-authentication, EAP re-authentication, etc.
From: Bernard Aboba (bernard_abobahotmail.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, it should probably be:

EAP re-authentication
The completion of EAP authentication between a peer and a server
with whom the EAP peer shares valid unexpired keying material.

From: "Alper Yegin" <alper.yegin [at] yegin.org>
To: "'Bernard Aboba'" <bernard_aboba [at] hotmail.com>,<eap [at] frascone.com>
Subject: RE: [eap] EAP pre-authentication, EAP re-authentication, etc.
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:52:23 +0300


> EAP re-authentication > The completion of EAP authentication between a peer and an authenticator > with whom the EAP peer shares valid unexpired keying material.

Yes, this looks good taking into account "the authenticator."

How about "the authentication server?" Completing of a new EAP
authentication with the authentication server while the two are still
sharing an unexpired EMSK could also be considered "re-authentication". This
is not related to the authenticator at all (i.e., it may or may not be a
re-authentication with the authenticator).


Are we only interested in re-authentication with respect to the
authenticators?

Alper




Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.