| Re: Keying lifetimes (WG LC "Keying Fwk") | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Alper Yegin (alper.yegin |
|
| Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:15:10 -0700 (PDT) | |
> >Alper: Secure Association Protocol is a "consumer" of MSK. For that, I > >don't > >expect it to set the any attributes of the MSK it is "using." Doing > >otherwise is a hack, IMHO. I recommend we remove the current text from > this > >option. > > In practice the SAP handles this in a number of cases, including IKEv2, > 802.16e, and 11r. So I don't think we can leave it out. I don't think we want to recommend that method. For that, not even mentioning is the best thing, IMHO. If we really want to capture those examples, I'd say they should go with a "NOT RECOMMENDED" qualifier in the document. Alper
-
Keying lifetimes (WG LC "Keying Fwk") Alper Yegin, July 19 2006
-
Re: Keying lifetimes (WG LC "Keying Fwk") Bernard Aboba, July 21 2006
- Re: Keying lifetimes (WG LC "Keying Fwk") Alper Yegin, July 24 2006
-
Re: Keying lifetimes (WG LC "Keying Fwk") Bernard Aboba, July 21 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.