Re: Conclusion of the eap-keying WGLC
From: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 (Madjid.Nakhjirimotorola.com)
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Jari, Bernard,

Thank you for taking this issue into consideration. Yes I think the text
can be easily manipulated to allow for future specifications defining
usage of EMSK in key derivation.
I will look for the email.

Madjid


362    Lower layer params and EMSK

          Here Vidya and Madjid disagreed, but there was
          no followup. The disagreement may actually be
          on text that is from RFC 3748, however. I talked to Bernard
          and we can probably work out what to say so that you
          Vidya and Madjid are OK with it. Expect an e-mail from
          Bernard on this. In general, if there's future IETF work, such
          as work possibly coming out of the HOKEY effort, it can
          relax the rules from RFC 3748, just as RFC 3748 itself
          says: "(This restriction will be relaxed in a future
          document that specifies how the EMSK can be used.)"


Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.