| Re: Conclusion of the eap-keying WGLC | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 (Madjid.Nakhjiri |
|
| Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:12:36 -0700 (PDT) | |
Hi Jari, Bernard,
Thank you for taking this issue into consideration. Yes I think the text
can be easily manipulated to allow for future specifications defining
usage of EMSK in key derivation.
I will look for the email.
Madjid
362 Lower layer params and EMSK
Here Vidya and Madjid disagreed, but there was
no followup. The disagreement may actually be
on text that is from RFC 3748, however. I talked to Bernard
and we can probably work out what to say so that you
Vidya and Madjid are OK with it. Expect an e-mail from
Bernard on this. In general, if there's future IETF work, such
as work possibly coming out of the HOKEY effort, it can
relax the rules from RFC 3748, just as RFC 3748 itself
says: "(This restriction will be relaxed in a future
document that specifies how the EMSK can be used.)"
-
Conclusion of the eap-keying WGLC Jari Arkko, June 24 2006
- Re: Conclusion of the eap-keying WGLC Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1, June 29 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.