| Re: Issue 370: Key Management | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 13:16:09 -0700 (PDT) | |
Looks good to me. --Jari >The proposed resolution is to change Section 3 from: > >"3. Key Management > > EAP as defined in [RFC3748] supports key derivation, but does not > provide for the management of exported or derived keys. Although EAP > methods may support "fast reconnect" as defined in [RFC3748] Section > 7.2.1, EAP does not support re-key of exported keys without re- > authentication." > >to: > >"3. Key Management > > EAP as defined in [RFC3748] supports key derivation, but does not > provide for the management of exported or derived keys. Missing > functionality includes: > >[a] Re-key. EAP does not support re-key of exported keys without re- > authentication, although EAP methods may support "fast reconnect" > as defined in [RFC3748] Section 7.2.1. > >[b] Key delete/install semantics. EAP does not synchronize > installation or deletion of keying material on the EAP peer and > authenticator. > >[c] Lifetime negotiation. EAP does not support lifetime negotiation for > exported keys, and existing EAP methods also do not support key > lifetime negotiation. > >[d] Cryptographic algorithm negotiation. EAP methods only negotiate > cryptographic algorithms for their own use, not for the underlying > lower layers. > >[e] Guaranteed TSK freshness. Without a post-EAP handshake, TSKs can > be reused if EAP keying material is cached. > > These deficiencies are typically addressed via a post-EAP handshake > known as the Secure Association Protocol." > > >_________________________________________________________________ >To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap > >Arhives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/eap > > > >
-
Issue 370: Key Management Bernard Aboba, June 23 2006
- Re: Issue 370: Key Management Jari Arkko, June 24 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.