eap Mailing List: New work item in EAP WG??: Questions for draft-barany-eap-gee-01

[Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 (Madjid.Nakhjiri]

Madjid>>I am trying to understand all this. EAP WG is closing, which
means that it does not accept any new WG items? So first of all this WG
is not the place to standardize anything new. Second even if it were. To
standardize a new item, first people describe the problem, then get it
approved as a problem that needs to be solved by the WG (i.e. WG item),
then people debate about how to solve it and if there are multiple
solutions which one is best.
Not only I think this has not yet been established as a legitimate
problem, but also I think challenging people by demanding an alternate
solution is not quite the IETF way to do things.

Madjid

With your last statement, are you saying that there is another way to 
demultiplex multiple parallel EAP exchanges?  If so, I would like to 
read about it.   Please share the reference.  Thanks.

regards,
Lakshminath