| Re: About use of EMSK | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:20:05 -0800 (PST) | |
Narayanan, Vidya wrote: > I don't think the keying framework document would still discuss this. > I think there is consensus that the text about EMSK will be in a > separate document. The issue was discussed in the context of the EAP > keying framework, since there are parts of that document that > specifically say that the EMSK MUST NOT be transported and MUST be > deleted - question is whether we can change that wording and leave any > other explanation on EMSK usage or AMSK derivation to a future spec. What we intend to do, I think, is to set the high-level requirements for EMSK in the keying framework (e.g., MUST NOT be transported). But the derivation of AMSKs from the EMSK, and the specific proposals for specific uses of the AMSKs in applications need to be in other documents. In any case, I'm hoping that what we say in the keying framework document holds and does not have to be changed in these other documents. --Jari
- RE: About use of EMSK, (continued)
-
RE: About use of EMSK Salowey, Joe, March 6 2006
- Re: About use of EMSK Jari Arkko, March 6 2006
- RE: About use of EMSK Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1, March 6 2006
-
RE: About use of EMSK Narayanan, Vidya, March 17 2006
- Re: About use of EMSK Jari Arkko, March 28 2006
-
RE: About use of EMSK Salowey, Joe, March 6 2006
- RE: About use of EMSK Narayanan, Vidya, March 28 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.