eap Mailing List: RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement?

[Narayanan, Vidya (vidyan]

I would agree with Joe here that the actual text (to the extent we have
been discussing this) belongs in an EMSK specific document. However,
there are places in the EAP keying document that state "MUST NOT cache
keying materials..." - I wonder if those can be changed in accordance
with the consensus we have on the topic. 

Also, what would be the home going forward for the EAP keying extensions
work? 

Thanks,
Vidya 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Salowey, Joe [mailto:jsalowey [at] cisco.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 2:36 PM
> To: Jari Arkko; eap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: RE: [eap] Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement?
> 
> I can work on some specific proposed text for this, however 
> it is not clear to me if this belongs in the current EAP 
> keying document or an EMSK specific document.  I'm not sure 
> we resolved this.  I think it probably belongs in its own 
> document discussing EMSK guidelines and usage.
> 
> Joe  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko [at] piuha.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 3:12 AM
> > To: eap [at] frascone.com
> > Subject: Re: [eap] Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement?
> > 
> > It seems that we have converged on this issue. Is there anyone who 
> > would like to suggest specific text changes?
> > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
> > 
> > Arhives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/eap
> > 
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
> 
> Arhives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/eap
>