| Re: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:30:03 -0800 (PST) | |
Avi Lior wrote: > >>I do not think we need a protocol definition between the AAA >>and EAP layers; this is mostly an API in any case. >> >> > >What about the API to fetch the MSK? Or to Push the MSK? >What about the API to send the EAP message from the AAA to the EAP AS? >What about the API to retrieve the EAP message from the EAP-AS? >Etc....why are we forgetting these as well? > > I am not saying that they are not needed. The question is whether the IETF wants to get into the business of standardizing such APIs. We mostly deal with what happens on the wire, in protocols. --Jari
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement?, (continued)
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Narayanan, Vidya, March 10 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Avi Lior, March 10 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Narayanan, Vidya, March 10 2006
-
RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Avi Lior, March 12 2006
- Re: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Jari Arkko, March 13 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Avi Lior, March 13 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Avi Lior, March 14 2006
-
RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Salowey, Joe, March 14 2006
- Re: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Rafa Marin Lopez, March 14 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.