| RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Avi Lior (avi |
|
| Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 21:13:54 -0800 (PST) | |
Joe, > -----Original Message----- > From: Salowey, Joe [mailto:jsalowey [at] cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 12:16 AM > To: Avi Lior; Narayanan, Vidya; Jari Arkko > Cc: eap [at] frascone.com > Subject: RE: [eap] Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Avi Lior [mailto:avi [at] bridgewatersystems.com] > > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:03 PM > > To: Salowey, Joe; Narayanan, Vidya; Jari Arkko > > Cc: eap [at] frascone.com > > Subject: RE: [eap] Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? > > > > Joe and All, > > > > I totally agree with Joe. > > > > AAA is a protocol that transports and cant realy cache > anything in the > > case of RADIUS which is stateless. > > > > So any caching has to be outside AAA or with AAA (but > Diameter only). > > [Joe] I think a AAA server is typically composed of several > components. > One of these can be a key holder. I don't see why you > couldn't define new functionality in RADIUS to interact with > the key holder (other than the fact that it seems to be > difficult to define anything new in RADIUS). [Avi] Aboslutely correct on all fronts ;-). A AAA server can have EAP-AS (authetncation server) and a key holder/key generator. So I guess ia m being very formal in the sense that AAA is a protocol and not a server. And BTW I don't think we need to have an RFC to define a Key Holder function in RADIUS servers. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Salowey, Joe [mailto:jsalowey [at] cisco.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:59 PM > > > To: Narayanan, Vidya; Avi Lior; Jari Arkko > > > Cc: eap [at] frascone.com > > > Subject: RE: [eap] Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess when you say EAP Authentication Server, it is a > bit vague > > > > about whether that is the EAP layer or AAA layer. I'm > not sure if > > > > there is value in clarifying this or if it makes more sense > > > to leave > > > > it to implementation. > > > > > > > [Joe] I'm pretty convinced it is in EAP. In the pictures the AAA > > > layer appears to carry communication between AAA client and AAA > > > server, I do not think this is where the EMSK belongs. > > > > > > > > > > > >
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement?, (continued)
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Avi Lior, March 9 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Salowey, Joe, March 9 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Avi Lior, March 9 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Salowey, Joe, March 9 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Avi Lior, March 9 2006
-
Re: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Jari Arkko, March 10 2006
- Re: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Rafa Marin Lopez, March 10 2006
- Re: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? : EAP peer/authenticator Rafa Marin Lopez, March 10 2006
- Re: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Jari Arkko, March 12 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.