| Re: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 03:24:10 -0800 (PST) | |
Avi Lior wrote: >Perhaps you missed my poorly stated point :-) > >What if the user is requesting access to a new application? which could >also involve the modification of the user's profile. >If EMSK is not there, then what do I do? Restart the session? No. > >At anyrate I belive that there could be other use cases... I gave two >reason why: > >Just-in-time; >Dynamic-Application provisioning. > > Ok. I'm starting to be convinced that we need to support some form of dynamic behaviour with regards to AMSKs. --Jari
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement?, (continued)
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1, March 6 2006
-
RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Avi Lior, March 6 2006
- Re: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Jari Arkko, March 6 2006
-
RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Avi Lior, March 6 2006
- Re: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Jari Arkko, March 9 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Salowey, Joe, March 6 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1, March 6 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1, March 6 2006
- RE: Strawman -10/EMSK deletion requirement? Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1, March 6 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.