| Re: issue 325 - channel bindings | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 04:08:59 -0800 (PST) | |
Ok.
Bernard Aboba wrote:
Bernard Aboba wrote:
How about this?
"Channel Bindings include lower layer parameters that are verified for consistency between the EAP peer and server. In order to avoid introducing media dependencies, EAP methods that transport Channel Binding data MUST treat this data as opaque octets.
Typically the EAP method imports Channel Bindings from the lower layer on the peer, and transmits them securely to the EAP server, which exports them to the lower layer or AAA layer. However, transport may occur from EAP server to peer, or may be bi-directional. On the side of the exchange (peer or server) where Channel Bindings are verified, the lower layer or AAA layer passes the result of the verification (TRUE or FALSE) up to the EAP method.
While the verification can be done either by the peer or the server, typically only the server has the knowledge to determine the correctness of the values, as opposed to merely verifying their equality."
-
issue 325 - channel bindings Jari Arkko, March 6 2006
-
RE: issue 325 - channel bindings Bernard Aboba, March 6 2006
-
Re: issue 325 - channel bindings Jari Arkko, March 6 2006
- Re: issue 325 - channel bindings Bernard Aboba, March 6 2006
- Re: issue 325 - channel bindings Jari Arkko, March 6 2006
- Re: issue 325 - channel bindings Yoshihiro Ohba, March 6 2006
- Re: issue 325 - channel bindings Mohan Parthasarathy, March 6 2006
-
Re: issue 325 - channel bindings Jari Arkko, March 6 2006
-
RE: issue 325 - channel bindings Bernard Aboba, March 6 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.