| Channel binding approaches (Was: Re: [eap] Strawman -10) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 11:40:49 -0800 (PST) | |
The channel binding discussion has been interesting. I can actually see a number of different alternatives even within Yoshihiro's method. For instance, L2 could negotiate the use of channel bindings and have AAA inform the server of the need to use MSK_cb instead of the regular MSK. Or EAP method could negotiate this. Or the use of channel bindings would be dictated by the used lower layer, I'm not sure which approach is the best one; there are tradeoffs. Generally I like approaches where we don't need to change EAP methods but YMMV. In any case, I'm happy with what the -10 says about channel bindings, and perhaps the results of this discussion can be incorporated to Yoshihiro's draft. --Jari
- Re: Strawman -10, (continued)
- Re: Strawman -10 Bernard Aboba, February 7 2006
- Re: Strawman -10 Yoshihiro Ohba, February 7 2006
- Re: Strawman -10 Bernard Aboba, February 7 2006
- Re: Strawman -10 Yoshihiro Ohba, February 7 2006
- Channel binding approaches (Was: Re: [eap] Strawman -10) Jari Arkko, March 5 2006
- Re: Channel binding approaches (Was: Re: [eap] Strawman -10) Yoshihiro Ohba, March 8 2006
- Re: Strawman -10 Bernard Aboba, February 7 2006
- Re: Strawman -10 Jari Arkko, March 5 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.