| Re: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (bernard_aboba |
|
| Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:03:36 -0800 (PST) | |
Yes. Just looking at the layering may not reveal all details; even at L2 we have both the selection of a particular access device, the selection of which access operator's network to use to begin with, and the selection of various things for the access control part. At L3 we may or may not have something to select, depending on scenario and whether some of the lower-level selections already determine what we will get at L2.
I like the handoff candidate selection term. But this may not be the only thing that L2 does.
I agree that we need to describe the different aspects of this problem in more detail. With respect to L3 "selection" I think we may also need more material. For example, where would "SSPN selection" fit?
-
NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Bernard Aboba, January 24 2006
-
RE: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Alper Yegin, January 25 2006
-
Re: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Jari Arkko, January 25 2006
- Re: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Bernard Aboba, January 25 2006
-
Re: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Jari Arkko, January 25 2006
-
RE: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Alper Yegin, January 25 2006
- RE: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Bari, Farooq, January 25 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.