| Re: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 03:07:03 -0800 (PST) | |
Alper Yegin wrote:
--Jari
b. The term has also been used to describe the problem of choosing between
"points
of attachment". For example, there are three APs out there, which one
should my
802.11 interface choose? In this context, the term "network" may actually
refer
to a desire to avoid having to change IP addresses by retaining attachment
to the same IP network or prefix. Perhaps the term "handoff
candidate selection" might better describe this problem?
In fact even this type of selection can be broken down into 2 or 3.
Selecting L1/L2 network, selecting L3 network, and even selecting a (Mobile
IP) home network.
Yes. Just looking at the layering may not reveal all details; even at L2 we have both the selection of a particular access device, the selection of which access operator's network to use to begin with, and the selection of various things for the access control part. At L3 we may or may not have something to select, depending on scenario and whether some of the lower-level selections already determine what we will get at L2.
I like the handoff candidate selection term. But this may not be the only thing that L2 does.
--Jari
-
NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Bernard Aboba, January 24 2006
-
RE: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Alper Yegin, January 25 2006
- Re: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Jari Arkko, January 25 2006
- Re: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Bernard Aboba, January 25 2006
-
RE: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Alper Yegin, January 25 2006
- RE: NETSEL Issue: Terminology issues Bari, Farooq, January 25 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.