| Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:30:15 -0800 (PST) | |
[Joe] OK, but do we need to restrict parameters? It seems that there
are some parameters that may be used in a security association
negotiation between peer and authentication.
Perhaps. I can agree that we should have the same restrictions for parameters (as did the original text). I just get a bit worried that we don't define the parameters. When we say, e.g., MSK, we know exactly what we mean.
--Jari
- RE: Issue: Use of term lower layer, (continued)
- RE: Issue: Use of term lower layer Alper Yegin, December 19 2005
-
RE: Issue: Use of term lower layer Salowey, Joe, December 7 2005
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Jari Arkko, December 13 2005
-
RE: Issue: Use of term lower layer Salowey, Joe, December 14 2005
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Jari Arkko, December 14 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.