RE: Issue: Use of term lower layer
From: Salowey, Joe (jsaloweycisco.com)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:58:24 -0800 (PST)
 
> 
> "In order to preserve the security of keys derived within EAP 
> methods, EAP keying material or parameters passed down to a 
> lower layer are for the exclusive use of that lower layer. 
> This prevents compromise of one lower layer from compromising 
> other applications using EAP keying parameters.
> 
> EAP keying material and parameters provided to a lower layer 
> MUST NOT be transported to another entity. The same applies 
> to other keying material derived from the EAP keying 
> material, if the EAP keying material can be computed from the 
> other material without breaking some cryptographic 
> assumption, such as inverting a one-way function. For 
> example, MSK passed down to the EAP peer lower layer or 
> transported to the authenticator MUST NOT leave the peer. "
> 
[Joe] OK, but do we need to restrict parameters?  It seems that there
are some parameters that may be used in a security association
negotiation between peer and authentication.

> --Jari
> 

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.