| Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Yoshihiro Ohba (yohba |
|
| Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:15:14 -0800 (PST) | |
I see what you mean. That works for me. Thank you, Yoshihiro Ohba On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 06:54:28PM +0200, Jari Arkko wrote: > Yoshihiro Ohba wrote: > > >I have read Issue 313, but I think it does not solve the SAP issue for > >PANA because PANA EP is not authenticator or even part of > >authenticator. > > > > > It could be, if you define authenticator = PAA + EP, or? > > --Jari > >
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer, (continued)
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Yoshihiro Ohba, December 13 2005
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Jari Arkko, December 13 2005
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Yoshihiro Ohba, December 13 2005
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Jari Arkko, December 13 2005
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Yoshihiro Ohba, December 13 2005
- RE: Issue: Use of term lower layer Alper Yegin, December 19 2005
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Jari Arkko, December 13 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.