| RE: Issue: Use of term lower layer | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Salowey, Joe (jsalowey |
|
| Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 08:55:55 -0800 (PST) | |
> > >--- > >Change > > > >"EAP keying material and parameters provided to a lower layer other > > than AAA MUST NOT be transported to another entity." > > > >To > > > >"EAP keying material and parameters provided to a lower > layer MUST NOT > >be transported to another entity." > > > > > Seems to prohibit distributed authenticators, including > 802.11r. I'd be OK with this if we didn't exclude > transportation of keys derived from the provided keys. > [Joe] OK, but I think the original text would cause problems with .11r as well. In any case I'm OK with the lower layer doing what ever it wants with the keys once it has them. I think what we want to avoid is the same keys and parameters being sent to more than one lower layer/application.
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer, (continued)
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Yoshihiro Ohba, December 13 2005
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Jari Arkko, December 13 2005
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Yoshihiro Ohba, December 13 2005
- RE: Issue: Use of term lower layer Alper Yegin, December 19 2005
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Jari Arkko, December 13 2005
- Re: Issue: Use of term lower layer Jari Arkko, December 14 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.