Re: Re: AMSKs for MIPv6
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkkopiuha.net)
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:47:11 -0500 (EST)
Julien Bournelle wrote:

the scenario that I had in mind is the one described by gerardo. We
have an authentication for network access using EAP. We derive an AMSK
for mip6. Then the mobile obtains an home agent and runs IKEv2. But
we'd like to use psk for authentication instead of EAP in the IKEv2
exchange. In this case, while recieving the third message of IKEv2 with
AUTH payload (the MN uses the AMSK-mip6 or key derived from AMSK-mip6
as psk), the HA requests the key to the AAA.


But is the reason to use PSK instead of EAP solely an
optimization issue, or are there roaming limitations
or somethat actually prevents the use of EAP?

As I mentioned in my original post, I'm not at all
convinced that we need to spend a lot of effort
optimizing the bootstrap procedure, if it already
works with existing protocols.

Other services such as FMIPv6 may benefit from such a mechanism based
on AMSK.


Maybe. Can you expand on why they would benefit?

--Jari



Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.