| RE: WGLC for eap-keying: EAP server-AAA server | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (bernard_aboba |
|
| Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:20:37 -0500 (EST) | |
1) EIK | PMK =truncate (MSK, 320) 2) PMK2= truncate (MSK, 160)
Both of these definitions imply that the PMK is a truncated version of the MSK. Perhaps we can just point that out, and reference 802.11 and 802.16e. There really is not much need to say anything more than that.
[Joe] The choice of AAA-Key term in the EAP RFC was unfortunate, it think it would have been better if we stuck just with the MSK.
Yes. The term "AAA-Key" has been the source of much confusion. It took quite a while, but at this point, the term is only used once in the EAP Keying Framework (in the terminology seciton).
Existing lower layers already use the MSK directly so I don't think defining
AMSKs derived from this quantity is appropriate in this document.
Right.
- Re: WGLC for eap-keying: EAP server-AAA server, (continued)
- Re: WGLC for eap-keying: EAP server-AAA server Jari Arkko, November 7 2005
-
RE: WGLC for eap-keying: EAP server-AAA server Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1, November 1 2005
- Re: WGLC for eap-keying: EAP server-AAA server Jari Arkko, November 7 2005
-
RE: WGLC for eap-keying: EAP server-AAA server David Mitton, November 1 2005
- RE: WGLC for eap-keying: EAP server-AAA server Bernard Aboba, November 1 2005
- Re: WGLC for eap-keying: EAP server-AAA server Jari Arkko, November 7 2005
-
RE: WGLC for eap-keying: EAP server-AAA server Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1, November 2 2005
- Re: WGLC for eap-keying: EAP server-AAA server Jari Arkko, November 7 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.