RE: Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt
From: Vanderveen, Michaela (MCVflarion.com)
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 14:39:29 -0400 (EDT)
Hello

We have decided to keep the title of the draft the same with the 
exception that the abbreviation is now EAP-MAKE2, where "2" stands
for version 2.
Version 1 does not refer to draft-berrendo, needless to say.

Thanks,
Michaela

-----Original Message-----
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko [at] piuha.net]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 9:37 AM
To: Vanderveen, Michaela
Cc: Soliman, Hesham; Bernard Aboba; eap [at] frascone.com
Subject: Re: [eap] Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt


Yes, please change the name. Maybe "Flarion MAKE", or
something along those lines.

Vanderveen, Michaela wrote:

>The description in the iana website is
>27      Mutual Authentication w/Key Exchange (MAKE) 
>
>and so it is different from
>
>        Mutual Authentication and Key Establishment (MAKE)
>
>In any case, numbers are not prevented from being a part of a 
>method name, and so MAKE2 is a possibility?
>
>Thanks,
>Michaela
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: eap-admin [at] frascone.com [mailto:eap-admin [at] frascone.com]On 
>Behalf Of
>Soliman, Hesham
>Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:03 PM
>To: Jari Arkko; Bernard Aboba
>Cc: eap [at] frascone.com
>Subject: RE: [eap] Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt
>
>
>
>
>
> > >The Block Allocation option is only available if 
> > >draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00 is in fact a specification for 
> > the EAP MAKE 
> > >protocol that was allocated EAP Type 27 by  IANA. 
> > >
> > >Otherwise, you will need to change the name. 
> > >  
> > >
> > And the third possibility is that if Type 27 == draft-vanderveen
> > then it may be that you are describing the deployed version,
> > in which case you already have allocation and the usual Individual
> > RFC submission rules apply, i.e., no EAP WG Expert Review.
>
>=> Well, you mean the old one gets deprecated and replaced with
>draft-vanderveen ? The old one was submitted by someone else
>and is not the same method AFAIK.
>
> > Though of course we'd be happy to run one for you.
>
>=> That would be good. 
>
>thx,
>Hesham
>
> > 
> > --Jari
> > 
> > 
>
>===========================================================
>This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
> of the intended recipient.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly
> prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender
> and delete all copies.
>===========================================================
>
>_______________________________________________
>eap mailing list
>eap [at] frascone.com
>http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
>_______________________________________________
>eap mailing list
>eap [at] frascone.com
>http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
>
>
>  
>


===========================================================
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
 of the intended recipient.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly
 prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender
 and delete all copies.
===========================================================


Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.