question on bellare-rogaway
From: Vanderveen, Michaela (MCVflarion.com)
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 14:39:29 -0400 (EDT)
Hello,

With the occasion of the EAP-PSK review at the last IETF, a question arose 
whether the
mutual authentication in this method is considered flawed for not following 
exactly the
classic (formally proven) Bellare-Rogaway protocol, in that one element is 
not communicated explicitly over the wire, but only used in the calculation of 
the MAC.

Not having attended that particular meeting, I am wondering if an opinion has 
formed as 
to whether this practice is acceptable in the cryptographic community. 
Better yet, does anyone know if there are any formal proofs of
modifications of the Bellare-Rogaway protocol that use the nonces in 
computations of
MACs but do not send them explicitly.

This question would be important for authentication protocols designed to run
over bandwidth-limited links.
Thanks,

Michaela





Michaela Vanderveen, Ph.D.
Advanced Networking
Flarion Technologies, Inc.
email: mcv [at] flarion.com


===========================================================
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
 of the intended recipient.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly
 prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender
 and delete all copies.
===========================================================


Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.