| RE: Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (aboba |
|
| Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:11:35 -0400 (EDT) | |
> => So I guess there are two options for progressing forward: > a. Change the name of the method, or > b. Go for the block allocation, which needs IETF concensus. > > I don't know if the existing allocation (type 27) is being used by anyone > but we're happy with either option, whatever works quicker is fine with > us. Does it matter which path we take? It seems that either way we > will need WG concensus to make progress, right? The Block Allocation option is only available if draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00 is in fact a specification for the EAP MAKE protocol that was allocated EAP Type 27 by IANA. Otherwise, you will need to change the name.
-
Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt Bernard Aboba, September 22 2005
-
RE: Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt Soliman, Hesham, September 22 2005
- RE: Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt Bernard Aboba, September 22 2005
- Re: Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt Jari Arkko, September 22 2005
-
RE: Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt Soliman, Hesham, September 22 2005
- RE: Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt Soliman, Hesham, September 22 2005
-
RE: Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt Vanderveen, Michaela, September 23 2005
- Re: Re: I-D ACTION: draft-vanderveen-eap-make-00.txt Jari Arkko, September 23 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.