| channel binding | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Charles Clancy (clancy |
|
| Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:03:12 -0400 (EDT) | |
Channel binding transmits channel parameters between the EAP client and
EAP server in some protected way. When done by methods, it seems the
general approach is to encrypt it (PSK, TTLS, etc), guaranteeing
authenticity. Is there any reason why it a MAC over the blob would be
insufficient? Is confidentiality required for some reason?
I'm working on defining a protected channel in EAP-PAX for communicating channel binding info, and I'd like to avoid defining a symmetric-key encryption ciphersuite, as PAX is based on MACs.
I'm working on defining a protected channel in EAP-PAX for communicating channel binding info, and I'd like to avoid defining a symmetric-key encryption ciphersuite, as PAX is based on MACs.
[ t. charles clancy ]--[ tcc [at] umd.edu ]--[ www.cs.umd.edu/~clancy ] [ computer science ]-----[ university of maryland | college park ]
- RE: Re: Channel Binding, (continued)
- RE: Re: Channel Binding Salowey, Joe, August 15 2005
-
RE: RE: channel binding Salowey, Joe, August 25 2005
- Re: RE: channel binding Jari Arkko, August 25 2005
- RE: RE: channel binding Salowey, Joe, August 26 2005
- channel binding Charles Clancy, August 29 2005
- Re: channel binding Yoshihiro Ohba, August 29 2005
-
RE: channel binding Salowey, Joe, August 29 2005
- Re: channel binding Jari Arkko, August 29 2005
- RE: channel binding Salowey, Joe, August 30 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.