| Re: Re: Channel Binding | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:29:45 -0400 (EDT) | |
Yoshihiro Ohba wrote: >On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 07:15:21AM -0700, Bernard Aboba wrote: > > >>Perhaps the right way to do this is to describe the effects of different >>approaches on the architecture. For example, the exiting mechanism >>requires changes to EAP methods but not to the AAA server; Yoshi's >>proposal requires changes on the AAA server, but not to methods. >> >> > >Question: What functionality is part of AAA server here? If EAP >server implementation is also part of AAA server, I'd say both >mechanism requires some changes on the AAA server. > > It seems that AAA server (the box, not a layer) is going to be impacted in any case, as is the client. What we can talk about is whether the NAS is impacted or not. --Jari
- Re: Channel Binding, (continued)
-
Re: Channel Binding Bernard Aboba, August 13 2005
-
Re: Re: Channel Binding Jari Arkko, August 25 2005
- Re: Re: Channel Binding Bernard Aboba, August 25 2005
- Re: Re: Channel Binding Yoshihiro Ohba, August 25 2005
- Re: Re: Channel Binding Jari Arkko, August 25 2005
-
Re: Re: Channel Binding Jari Arkko, August 25 2005
-
Re: Channel Binding Bernard Aboba, August 13 2005
- Re: RE: channel binding Jari Arkko, August 25 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.