| Re: RE: channel binding | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Yoshihiro Ohba (yohba |
|
| Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:13:25 -0400 (EDT) | |
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:40:27PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > > > > OK. I think we are reaching some agreement on (please correct if I'm > > wrong): > > > > - Channel binding mechanism in EAP-IKEv2 should not be removed (but needs > > some > > modification to carry a blob in order to avoid the IANA assignment issue.) > > > > - Key-derivation based channel binidng solution should be specified as an > > extension to > > EAP keying framework. > > I'm a bit of a neutral party in this, so far. You'll want to see what > Joe and the rest of the EAP community have to say. Going by what Joe > has written already I think that only proposals involving changes to > specs that have not been implemented and deployed have a chance of > producing consensus. I have not heard any channel binding solution implemented and deployed, and the above changes should be ok in this regard. Yoshihiro Ohba > > Nico > -- > _______________________________________________ > eap mailing list > eap [at] frascone.com > http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap >
- Re: RE: channel binding, (continued)
- Re: RE: channel binding Yoshihiro Ohba, August 9 2005
- Re: RE: channel binding Nicolas Williams, August 10 2005
- Re: RE: channel binding Yoshihiro Ohba, August 11 2005
- Re: RE: channel binding Nicolas Williams, August 11 2005
- Re: RE: channel binding Yoshihiro Ohba, August 12 2005
- RE: RE: channel binding Yoshihiro Ohba, August 11 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.