Re: RE: channel binding
From: Yoshihiro Ohba (yohbatari.toshiba.com)
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:13:25 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:40:27PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > 
> > OK.  I think we are reaching some agreement on (please correct if I'm 
> > wrong):
> > 
> > - Channel binding mechanism in EAP-IKEv2 should not be removed (but needs 
> > some 
> > modification to carry a blob in order to avoid the IANA assignment issue.)
> > 
> > - Key-derivation based channel binidng solution should be specified as an 
> > extension to 
> > EAP keying framework.
> 
> I'm a bit of a neutral party in this, so far.  You'll want to see what
> Joe and the rest of the EAP community have to say.  Going by what Joe
> has written already I think that only proposals involving changes to
> specs that have not been implemented and deployed have a chance of
> producing consensus.

I have not heard any channel binding solution implemented and
deployed, and the above changes should be ok in this regard.

Yoshihiro Ohba


> 
> Nico
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> eap mailing list
> eap [at] frascone.com
> http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
> 

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.