| Re: Issue 305: Appendix Cleanup | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:09:49 -0400 (EDT) | |
Looks good to me. --Jari
Bernard Aboba wrote:
Bernard Aboba wrote:
Ok for me. When integrating A & D to section 2, make
sure the text represents these as examples (not
normative).
In working this through, I think it might be easier for now to combine A & D into a single Appendix B. Here is a strawman:
Appendix B - Example Transient Session Key (TSK) Derivation
To date, PPP and IEEE 802.11 ciphersuites are suitable for keying by EAP. This Appendix describes the keying requirements of common PPP and 802.11 ciphersuites.
PPP ciphersuites include DESEbis [RFC2419], 3DES [RFC2420], and MPPE [RFC3078]. The DES algorithm is described in [FIPSDES], and DES modes (such as CBC, used in [RFC2419] and DES-EDE3-CBC, used in [RFC2420]) are described in [DESMODES]. For PPP DESEbis, a single 56-bit encryption key is required, used in both directions. For PPP 3DES, a 168-bit encryption key is needed, used in both directions. As described in [RFC2419] for DESEbis and [RFC2420] for 3DES, the IV, which is different in each direction, is "deduced from an explicit 64-bit nonce, which is exchanged in the clear during the [ECP] negotiation phase." There is therefore no need for the IV to be provided by EAP.
For MPPE, 40-bit, 56-bit or 128-bit encryption keys are required in each direction, as described in [RFC3078]. No initialization vector is required.
While these PPP ciphersuites provide encryption, they do not provide per-packet authentication or integrity protection, so an authentication key is not required in either direction.
Within [IEEE-802.11], Transient Session Keys (TSKs) are required both for unicast traffic as well as for multicast traffic, and therefore separate key hierarchies are required for unicast keys and multicast keys. IEEE 802.11 ciphersuites include WEP-40, described in [IEEE-802.11], which requires a 40-bit encryption key, the same in either direction; and WEP-128, which requires a 104-bit encryption key, the same in either direction. These ciphersuites also do not support per-packet authentication and integrity protection. In addition to these unicast keys, authentication and encryption keys are required to wrap the multicast encryption key.
Recently, new ciphersuites have been proposed for use with IEEE 802.11 that provide per-packet authentication and integrity protection as well as encryption [IEEE-802.11i]. These include TKIP, which requires a single 128-bit encryption key and two 64-bit authentication keys (one for each direction); and AES CCMP, which requires a single 128-bit key (used in both directions) in order to authenticate and encrypt data.
As with WEP, authentication and encryption keys are also required to wrap the multicast encryption (and possibly, authentication) keys.
Within IEEE 802.11 RSN, the Pairwise Transient Key (PTK), a transient session key used to protect unicast traffic, is derived from the PMK (octets 0-31 of the MSK), known in [RFC2716] as the Peer to Authenticator Encryption Key. In [IEEE-802.11i], the PTK is derived from the PMK via the following formula:
PTK = EAPOL-PRF-X(PMK, "Pairwise key expansion", Min(AA,SA) || Max(AA, SA) || Min(ANonce,SNonce) || Max(ANonce,SNonce))
Where:
PMK = AAA-Key(0,31) SA = Station MAC address (Calling-Station-Id) AA = Access Point MAC address (Called-Station-Id) ANonce = Access Point Nonce SNonce = Station Nonce EAPOL-PRF-X = Pseudo-Random Function based on HMAC-SHA1, generating a PTK of size X octets.
TKIP uses X = 64, while CCMP, WRAP, and WEP use X = 48.
The EAPOL-Key Confirmation Key (KCK) is used to provide data origin authenticity in the TSK derivation. It utilizes the first 128 bits (bits 0-127) of the PTK. The EAPOL-Key Encryption Key (KEK) provides confidentiality in the TSK derivation. It utilizes bits 128-255 of the PTK. Bits 256-383 of the PTK are used by Temporal Key 1, and Bits 384-511 are used by Temporal Key 2. Usage of TK1 and TK2 is ciphersuite specific. Details are available in [IEEE-802.11i]
-
Issue 305: Appendix Cleanup Bernard Aboba, July 18 2005
-
Re: Issue 305: Appendix Cleanup Jari Arkko, July 18 2005
-
Re: Issue 305: Appendix Cleanup Bernard Aboba, July 18 2005
- Re: Issue 305: Appendix Cleanup Jari Arkko, July 29 2005
-
Re: Issue 305: Appendix Cleanup Bernard Aboba, July 18 2005
-
Re: Issue 305: Appendix Cleanup Jari Arkko, July 18 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.