| Re: Key derivation and the principle of equivalence | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (aboba |
|
| Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 09:51:43 -0400 (EDT) | |
> If I understand your comment correctly, even if the key Management > framework document defines EAP session-ID (or some other attribute > that servers as key versioning), if Diameter EAP needs to carry that > attribute, I think the attribute needs to be added in Diameter EAP > document and recycling would be needed anyways. Yes, I think that's true. > Yes. One means for that is to define a different type of > AVP/attribute for a AAA protocol to differenciate AMSK from MSK. I think this would require defining of a grouped AVP, since if there are multiple keys to be sent it would be necessary to tie together the key, session-ID and key-type AVPs. It also might make sense to define AVPs for the Peer-ID, Server-ID and Key-Lifetime within the same grouped AVP.
- Re: Key derivation and the principle of equivalence, (continued)
- Re: Key derivation and the principle of equivalence Bernard Aboba, May 17 2005
- Re: Key derivation and the principle of equivalence Yoshihiro Ohba, May 17 2005
- Re: Key derivation and the principle of equivalence Bernard Aboba, May 17 2005
- Re: Key derivation and the principle of equivalence Yoshihiro Ohba, May 17 2005
- Re: Key derivation and the principle of equivalence Bernard Aboba, May 18 2005
- Re: Key derivation and the principle of equivalence Jari Arkko, May 18 2005
- Re: Key derivation and the principle of equivalence Bernard Aboba, May 18 2005
- Re: Key derivation and the principle of equivalence Yoshihiro Ohba, May 18 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.