| Clarifications on "Domino effect" | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Julien Bournelle (julien.bournelle |
|
| Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 09:06:25 -0400 (EDT) | |
Hi all, In RFC4017, the Domino effect is described: "Compromise of a single authenticator cannot compromise any other part of the system, including session keys and long-term secrets." Does this finally imply that the authenticator MUST not provide keys to other entity ? regards, -- julien.bournelle at int-evry.fr
-
Clarifications on "Domino effect" Julien Bournelle, May 4 2005
-
Re: Clarifications on "Domino effect" Jari Arkko, July 29 2005
- RE: Clarifications on "Domino effect" Alper Yegin, July 31 2005
-
Re: Clarifications on "Domino Effect" Bernard Aboba, July 31 2005
- Re: Re: Clarifications on "Domino Effect" Jari Arkko, July 31 2005
-
Re: Clarifications on "Domino effect" Jari Arkko, July 29 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.