Re: Re: EAP key binding discussion
From: Rafa Marin Lopez (rafadif.um.es)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 08:15:37 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Jari.

Thanks for your answer ... please see below

Jari Arkko wrote:

Rafa Marin Lopez wrote:

After I read this, I think it seems to be similar to PANA when PAA is not colocated in the EP for example in the wireless LAN model(http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pana-framework-03.txt).

In fact PaC/EAP peer can derive one PMK per each EP/AP controlled by PAA. PAA can derive the same keys that would send to different EPs controlled by this PAA (how to derive PMKs per each EP/AP derived from AAA-key that PAA receives from AAA is ongoing work). So PAA would be like your LKDC. However PAA is also acting as NAS that is a difference what you propose.

On the other hand , when a EAP peer moves to another EP/AP controlled by another LKDC then we are moving the problem to allow a fast handoff between LKDCs. In the case of PANA , it is being treated in http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bournelle-pana-ctp-02.txt and http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pana-mobopts-00.txt

Moving the key controller node higher in the hierarchy does help a lot.

Agree



Both in your example above as well as in various L2 concentrator designs.


Regarding the derivation of "PMKs" per EP, isn't that already specified

in Section 5 of draft-ietf-pana-ipsec-05.txt -- the keys are different per EP
address and session ID.

True. Now what I was wondering if EAP key management framework allows a KDC hierarchy ... any thought about this?


Thanks.



--Jari

_______________________________________________
eap mailing list
eap [at] frascone.com
http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap





--
------------------------------------------------------
Rafael Marin Lopez
Faculty of Computer Science-University of Murcia
30071 Murcia - Spain
Telf: +34968367645    e-mail: rafa [at] dif.um.es
------------------------------------------------------


Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.