RE: FW: [eap] Re: EAP key binding discussion
From: Bernard Aboba (abobainternaut.com)
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:49:43 -0400 (EDT)
> What about disclosure of the keys between the authenticators??

Here is the requirement (from RFC 4017):

      Requirement: "Compromise of a single authenticator cannot
      compromise any other part of the system, including session keys
      and long-term secrets."

"any other part of the system" would seem to include other authenticators.

> I think EAP and its key management framework has not positioned itself
> well with respect to handovers and that is why the door for interpretations
> is being opened over and over.

I'd be interested in any data that you have collected on this.  Having
recently done some tests on handover times in WLAN switches, I was
surprised by how well the equipment performs.  For example, we have
measured handoffs of 25ms or less on a consistent basis with a number of
WLAN switch products.  These measurements were made on equipment implementing
RFC 3579, RFC 3748, and WPA2 (including pre-authentication).

I have collected published material on handoff times at the following
location:
http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/IEEE/

> the "mutual authentication" condition which requires mutual
> authentication between all parties,

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.