| RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Nelson, David (dnelson |
|
| Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:24:39 -0400 (EDT) | |
Glen Zorn writes... > I may not trust the government of the United States, but it has > authorized me (through the issuance of a passport) to leave the > country and return. I'm not sure this is an apt example of your point. I rather suspect that your distrust of the Federal government extends to areas other than whether or not the agency that issued you a passport has the authority to do so. :-) In terms of the trust needed for enforcement of authorization, in your example it is the trust relationship that various customs agents have with the US government (among others) that allows them to validate your passport and grant you passage. In general, I think that concept of authorization without any form of trust relationship is pretty useless.
- RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party, (continued)
- RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Bernard Aboba, April 26 2005
-
RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Glen Zorn (gwz), April 26 2005
-
RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Bernard Aboba, April 26 2005
- RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Glen Zorn (gwz), April 27 2005
-
RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Bernard Aboba, April 26 2005
- RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Nelson, David, April 27 2005
- RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Glen Zorn (gwz), April 27 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.