| RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (aboba |
|
| Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:30:36 -0400 (EDT) | |
No, RFC 2607 can stay as it is. You could add RFC 2607 to the list of normative references if you refer to it. The Updates: header just indicates that the draft contains material that updates the referred to RFC. That RFC doesn't itself need to change. On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Adrangi, Farid wrote: > Thanks! > > Are you suggesting that RFC 2607 needs to be updated for use with EAP? > If so, are we making that as a dependency for our Identity selection > draft? > > BR, > Farid
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12, (continued)
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, April 18 2005
-
RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Adrangi, Farid, April 25 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, April 25 2005
-
RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Adrangi, Farid, April 26 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, April 26 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Pasi.Eronen, April 27 2005
-
RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, May 10 2005
- Re: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Jari Arkko, May 11 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.