| RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (aboba |
|
| Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:07:36 -0400 (EDT) | |
> section 5.1 says that proxy must reply with Access-Reject or > Access-Challenge -- so why do you consider that additional proxy > behavior? > Thanks, > Farid RFC 2607 doesn't say what is contained in the Access-Reject (probably because it was written before use of EAP became popular). Back in those days, an Access-Reject would probably just contain a Reply-Message attribute with an error message, or maybe nothing at all. However, Reply-Message was deprecated in RFC 3579, so that won't work with EAP. Therefore the portion of the document that refers to acceptable proxy behavior in response to an unknown realm in an Access-Request containing EAP-Message attributes probably should be followed by all RADIUS proxies. It's a clarification of RFC 2607 for use with EAP.
-
[Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, April 18 2005
-
RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Adrangi, Farid, April 18 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, April 18 2005
-
RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Adrangi, Farid, April 25 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, April 25 2005
-
RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Adrangi, Farid, April 18 2005
-
RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Adrangi, Farid, April 26 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, April 26 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Pasi.Eronen, April 27 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, May 10 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.