RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12
From: Adrangi, Farid (farid.adrangiintel.com)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:19:12 -0400 (EDT)
section 5.1 says that proxy must reply with Access-Reject or
Access-Challenge -- so why do you consider that additional proxy
behavior?  
Thanks,
Farid

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:aboba [at] internaut.com] 
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 12:10 PM
> To: Adrangi, Farid
> Cc: eap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: RE: [eap] [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12
> 
> 
> > Looks reasonable to me.  Though I don't quite understand the last
> > comment:
> >
> > "Given that this specification changes AAA proxy behavior, I believe
> > that it should include "Updates: 2607" in the header."
> >
> > Could you please elaborate?
> 
> RFC 2607 is the document that specifies RADIUS proxy behavior 
> in roaming
> environments.  This document appears compatible with RFC 
> 2607, but it does
> specify additional proxy behavior (e.g. sending a Challenge 
> with a hint
> instead of Access-Reject).
> 
> 

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.