| RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Adrangi, Farid (farid.adrangi |
|
| Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:19:12 -0400 (EDT) | |
section 5.1 says that proxy must reply with Access-Reject or Access-Challenge -- so why do you consider that additional proxy behavior? Thanks, Farid > -----Original Message----- > From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:aboba [at] internaut.com] > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 12:10 PM > To: Adrangi, Farid > Cc: eap [at] frascone.com > Subject: RE: [eap] [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 > > > > Looks reasonable to me. Though I don't quite understand the last > > comment: > > > > "Given that this specification changes AAA proxy behavior, I believe > > that it should include "Updates: 2607" in the header." > > > > Could you please elaborate? > > RFC 2607 is the document that specifies RADIUS proxy behavior > in roaming > environments. This document appears compatible with RFC > 2607, but it does > specify additional proxy behavior (e.g. sending a Challenge > with a hint > instead of Access-Reject). > >
-
[Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, April 18 2005
-
RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Adrangi, Farid, April 18 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, April 18 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Adrangi, Farid, April 25 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, April 25 2005
-
RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Adrangi, Farid, April 18 2005
-
RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Adrangi, Farid, April 26 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Bernard Aboba, April 26 2005
- RE: [Issue 297] Review of Identity Selection -12 Pasi.Eronen, April 27 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.