| Re: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: John Vollbrecht (jrv |
|
| Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:31:23 -0400 (EDT) | |
Nice explanation David. I have clarifying question below -
On Apr 21, 2005, at 11:37 AM, Nelson, David wrote:
What is your thought?
On Apr 21, 2005, at 11:37 AM, Nelson, David wrote:
Apler Yegin writes...The question I am wondering about is whether the RADIUS server could be a trusted third party if it is directly connected to the NAS. In that case it has credentials with all parties. However the credentials are of quite different form - I am wondering if the form of credentials or the relationship between the credentials makes a difference in whether it can act effectively as a trusted third party. My first guess is that it could (especially if RADIUS had stronger hashing) but I am not sure.
DoesI guess the AAA protocol that runs between the NAS and AAA server is a "wire" as you said, but the AAA server is the trusted third party.this make sense?
I think there is a subtle difference between a "trusted third party" and
a RADIUS server which may have bi-lateral trust relationships with
various parties. The RADIUS server will always have a trust
relationship with its enrolled Radius clients, via the shared secret.
Those clients may be NASes or they may be RADIUS proxy servers. RADIUS
trust is always hop-by-hop.
Strictly speaking, the RADIUS server has a trust relationship with the human user only when the native RADIUS password database is used as the source of authentication credentials. Most often, the RADIUS server relies on some other authentication service (e.g. Active Directory, LDAP, NIS, etc.). One tends to think of this as a single entity, and for certain purposes this is fine. For other purposes, we need to retain the distinction.
The host (e.g. via a machine certificate) may also have a trust relationship, but once again this relationship is typically with an EAP server "attached" to the Radius server, which may in turn rely on other authentication services.
What is your thought?
A more typical example of a "trusted third party" is a Kerberos KDC which does in fact directly share credentials with all enrolled principals (human users, hosts or applications).
_______________________________________________ eap mailing list eap [at] frascone.com http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
- RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party, (continued)
- RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Glen Zorn (gwz), April 19 2005
-
Re: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Jeff Mandin, April 20 2005
- RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Glen Zorn (gwz), April 20 2005
-
RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Nelson, David, April 21 2005
- Re: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party John Vollbrecht, April 21 2005
-
RE: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Bernard Aboba, April 21 2005
- Re: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Julien Bournelle, April 22 2005
- Re: RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party Bernard Aboba, April 22 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.