| RE: Re: EAP Key Binding | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Alper Yegin (alper.yegin |
|
| Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:22:09 -0400 (EDT) | |
The centralized model encourages AC implementations to use one
PMK
for many different WTPs. This practice facilitates speedy
transition
by a station from one WTP to another WTP that is connected to
the same
AC without establishing a separate PMK. However, this leaves
the station
in a difficult position. The station cannot distinguish between
a
compromised PMK and one that is intentionally being shared. This
issue must
be resolved, but the resolution is beyond the scope of the
CAPWAP working group.
So, the issue is about binding PMK to NAS ports (WTPs in this case).
Unless the NAS explicitly informs the host about the list of ports, how
can this be handled? I think this is an issue for the EAP lower layer to
handle.
Alper
- RE: Re: EAP Key Binding, (continued)
-
RE: Re: EAP Key Binding Walker, Jesse, April 17 2005
- RE: Re: EAP Key Binding Bernard Aboba, April 17 2005
-
RE: Re: EAP Key Binding Walker, Jesse, April 18 2005
-
Re: Re: EAP Key Binding Dorothy Stanley, April 18 2005
- RE: Re: EAP Key Binding Alper Yegin, April 20 2005
- RE: Re: EAP Key Binding Bernard Aboba, April 20 2005
- RE: Re: EAP Key Binding Alper Yegin, April 20 2005
-
Re: Re: EAP Key Binding Dorothy Stanley, April 18 2005
-
RE: Re: EAP Key Binding Walker, Jesse, April 17 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.