| Re: Issue 286: Security | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 05:45:34 -0500 (EST) | |
Hi Farid,
Looking only at your alternative 3 below ...
--Jari
Looking only at your alternative 3 below ...
3) Assuming that this is okay, why would there be a need for AAA or AP network advertisement? For example, the peer (user [at] anyisp.com) can indicate its route preferences in EAP-Identity/Response as follows:
user [at] anyisp.com; anyisp.com!user [at] isp1; anyisp.com!user [at] isp2; anyisp.com!user [at] isp3
... I just wanted to point out that doing this would probably break NASes that expect to see a NAI and suddenly run into a ';'. (This may be OK if you are using this only as a last resort, but then you have probably tried all the four alternatives already. It isn't clear to me that this would help any more at that stage.)
--Jari
-
Issue 286: Security Bernard Aboba, February 13 2005
- Re: Issue 286: Security Jari Arkko, February 13 2005
- Re: Issue 286: Security Jari Arkko, February 14 2005
-
RE: Issue 286: Security Adrangi, Farid, February 13 2005
- Re: Issue 286: Security Jari Arkko, February 14 2005
-
RE: Issue 286: Security Bari, Farooq, February 13 2005
- RE: Issue 286: Security Bernard Aboba, February 13 2005
-
Re: Issue 286: Security Jari Arkko, February 14 2005
- Re: Issue 286: Security Jari Arkko, February 15 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.