RE: RE: Comments on draft-adrangi-eap-network-discovery-07.txt
From: Glen Zorn (gwz) (gwzcisco.com)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:40:36 -0500 (EST)
Bari, Farooq <> supposedly scribbled:

...

>> 
>>> but it seems that your protocol is giving away (by design) a lot
of
>>> information about network topology and even contracts to anybody
who
>>> happens along.
>> 
>> [FA] yes, roaming partners of the access network is given away.
So,
>> let's identify how MITM
> 
> This isn't a man-in-the-middle attack; I don't have to eavesdrop,
I
> just have to ask. 
> 
> (FB) so what - should the service providers stop advertising their
> presence...I am not sure what you  are suggesting. If service
> providers can not announce their presence for fear of an attack
then
> I am not sure how they can serve their customers....should the hot
> spot operator stop announcing its presence as well for fear of an
> attack?     
> 
>> can take advantage of the information and attack the network, in
>> addition to what we already mentioned it in the draft.
> 
> Did you mention this in the draft?  I must have missed it.  In any
> case, how many attacks are enabled by having access to a network
and
> knowing which network it is?  Suppose that one of the realms being
> advertised is intel.com.  That's wonderful!  I don't have to
war-dial
> (or -drive) to find a way into Intel's network, it's right there
in
> the comfort of my local Starbucks, advertised for all to see!  Of
> course, I don't have credentials, but a user ID should be easy to
> come by.  Maybe I can't get inside the Intel network easily, but
> let's see, if I fail authentication n times, will the account be
> disabled?  That should provide a little entertainment!  The point
is,
> this draft (by design) opens a hole that wasn't there before. How
big
> a truck can be driven through it remains to be seen...          
> 
> (FB) Again your reasoning is difficult for me to comprehend. All
> cellular providers for example do advertise their presence e.g via
> boradcasting a PLMN. That is how the subscribers can get to their
> networks. This broadcast is visible to all non subscribers as
well.   
> Should they stop broadcasting their presence for fear of an
attack. I
> can probably right a very long email on it but I wait for your
> response as to why do you expect service providers should stop
> broadcasting their presence ....

Don't wait too long.  I give up.

~gwz

Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be solved by
simply
  listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.