| Re: RFC 3748 Review of EAP SIM | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (aboba |
|
| Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:03:28 -0500 (EST) | |
> Now I think I understand what your problem was. Would > it help if the document(s) stated that ONE registry of > parameters is established at IANA? Yes. Presumably that registry would only be established and initial values listed in one of the drafts; the other could state "no registries or parameter allocation required". You'd save some time in IANA review, too ;)
- How to design fast handoffs (Was: Re: [eap] RFC 3748 Review of EAP SIM), (continued)
- How to design fast handoffs (Was: Re: [eap] RFC 3748 Review of EAP SIM) Jari Arkko, November 22 2004
- Re: How to design fast handoffs Bernard Aboba, November 22 2004
- RE: RFC 3748 Review of EAP SIM Joseph Salowey, November 22 2004
- Re: RFC 3748 Review of EAP SIM Bernard Aboba, November 22 2004
- RE: RFC 3748 Review of EAP SIM Bernard Aboba, November 22 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.