eap Mailing List: Re: RFC 3748 Review of EAP SIM

[Jari Arkko (jari.arkko]

Bernard Aboba wrote:

> I think there is an issue with the IANA considerations
> section.
>
> An IANA registry is requested for the Subtype and Attribute
> Type number, allocated using "specification required".  No
> review mechanism is specified, yet it is indicated that the
> same protocol numbers should be assigned to EAP AKA and EAP
> SIM.  It is not clear how this requirement is to be enforced,
> given the allocation policy.  The authors may wish to rethink this.

Now I think I understand what your problem was. Would
it help if the document(s) stated that ONE registry of
parameters is established at IANA?

--Jari